2 ms·
It's not meaningless, people have whole PhDs in this stuff and it's a component of the concentration of social cultural anthropology. https://en.wikipedia.org/
by neom 1y ago
It's not meaningless, people have whole PhDs in this stuff and it's a component of the concentration of social cultural anthropology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentino_(fashion_house) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentino_(fashion_house)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentino_(fashion_designer) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valentino_(fashion_designer)
But within the houses system, Valentino sits somewhere specific. Hence I am being specific about The House of Valentino.
Valentino = Warhol.
- scotty79 1y agoNobody wears Worhol's. Because there's no such thing. Because Warhol is not Valentino. And PhDs were written on even sillier stuff.
- neom 1y agoThese things exist in this world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artist They're pretty cool, I recommend learning about them, personally, I did a whole degree on it...won 4 Emmy awards being one...silly me...
- scotty79 1y agoArtists are cool, fashion designers however are bane of this world because they help funnel insane amount of materials straight to a landfill. Congrats on your Emmys. Not sure why your interests include something as mundane as shoes and arguing with opinionated idiot on the internet. You obviously have better things to think about.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]