> Remarkably, the lone survivor wasn't Rust or Go, as many of us had predicted. It was Erlang. This is what the Erlang VM was exactly designed for, yet these "

> Remarkably, the lone survivor wasn't Rust or Go, as many of us had predicted. It was Erlang. This is what the Erlang VM was exactly designed for, yet these "programmers" claim to be surprised that it didn't crash under heavy load, unlike the rest? The language runtime is what was under test rather than the language itself. Mediocrity and hype are once again celebrated.