4 ms·
It is not a troll. I was talking about safety for the drivers in the car that collide with the EV. They are less safe with EVs on the road. When we have margi
by m101 1y ago
It is not a troll.
I was talking about safety for the drivers in the car that collide with the EV. They are less safe with EVs on the road.
When we have marginal electricity pricing, and electric cars necessarily being marginal demand, then they will ramp pricing a lot for all users, not just those driving electric cars. This far outweighs the benefit of grid balancing services (which this green revolution has created the need for).
I think you are not informed on the cost of renewables and therefore co2 cost. Just look at interconnection fees in the US. They have until recently got off for free on being added to the grid, but there was always a cost they imposed on the grid they didn't pay for. Now they have to pay high fees, and therefore high co2 costs to upgrade grid infrastructure.
My experience, in the UK and Europe, with ev infrastructure has been pretty terrible, especially when compared to just filling up with petrol. The cost advantage is also disappearing fast especially at public charging electricity rates.
Efficiency above 80% is clearly worse than below 80%. I drove 30k miles in a Tesla on road trips and saw that consistently.
I forgot to mention that once I lost 3% battery in waiting in the heat and air conditioning at a border crossing one time. That glass ceiling is not a good idea in hot climates.
- 0xAFFFF 1y ago> I was talking about safety for the drivers in the car that collide with the EV. They are less safe with EVs on the road. This argument would look sensible if the car industry, especially in North America (but the rest of the world is slowly following suit) wasn't pushing for bigger and bigger and bigger cars, that are inherently safer for their passengers and way more dangerous for everyone around. You can have BEV and reasonably sized cars. Car bloat overall is way bigger than the EV weight issue.
- borski 1y ago> I was talking about safety for the drivers in the car that collide with the EV. They are less safe with EVs on the road. So is a Model T. But we aren’t all still driving Model Ts, are we? Technology improves, and of course older cars are less safe. There is a weight difference, but it’s no different from that of an SUV vs. a Corolla. > Efficiency above 80% is clearly worse than below 80%. I drove 30k miles in a Tesla on road trips and saw that consistently. Depends on the car, but the reason for this is almost solely because you lose regenerative breaking at high SOC. That’s less efficient, but not less efficient than an ICE car, and you only do it on road trips, which don’t happen often.
- m101 1y agoI am not certain it's because of the lack of regen. On road trips you're mainly doing motorway driving anyway. My point about safety is that extra weight is inherent to the technology and the alternatives available (combustion engine). Horses were not an alternative to the model t in the same way.
- LeoPanthera 1y agoI think you know this is propaganda. I know that you won't, but anyone else reading this might like to look up the weight of the most popular vehicles sold in the US. You might be surprised that virtually none of the heaviest ones are BEVs.
- m101 1y agohttps://flowingdata.com/2024/09/04/weight-of-cars-and-fatalities/ https://flowingdata.com/2024/09/04/weight-of-cars-and-fatali...
- linotype 1y ago> I forgot to mention that once I lost 3% battery in waiting in the heat and air conditioning at a border crossing one time. That glass ceiling is not a good idea in hot climates Unless you were stopped for half a day, that didn’t happen.
- Schiendelman 1y agoCome on, that's perfectly feasible. I've sat for an hour at a border crossing and lost that much on a hot day.