3 ms·
People don't scale. This is graphically implied in Maslow's Hierarchy[1], shown as a pyramid. The area of the abstractions occurring up the individual's pyrami
by smitty1e 1y ago
People don't scale. This is graphically implied in Maslow's Hierarchy[1], shown as a pyramid.
The area of the abstractions occurring up the individual's pyramid is dwarfed by the area of the base needs.
The more people you consider, the more the basic needs for e.g. food and shelter dominate.
Finely nuanced abstractions about rights and aesthetics? Don't waste your breath on more than the substet of the population whose heads linger around the top of the pyramid.
Someone else who understood this non-scalability point was Gustav Le Bon[2].
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs
[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crowd:_A_Study_of_the_Popular_Mind https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Crowd:_A_Study_of_the_Po...
- ZYbCRq22HbJ2y7 1y ago> People don't scale There are 8.2 billion of them, so I think they scale just fine.
- smitty1e 1y ago8.2n individuals, sure. But look how hard it is to wage peace in the Ukraine...
- ZYbCRq22HbJ2y7 1y agoI understand your point, but it seems a lot better than some other scenarios throughout human history. Also, there are way more humans now than at those points. Also, I am not sure how accurate this, but maybe something worth taking into consideration: https://theconversation.com/its-ukraine-not-the-ukraine-heres-why-178748 https://theconversation.com/its-ukraine-not-the-ukraine-here...