4 ms·
I would say "low-cost, high-impact" when that makes more sense. In this case it's more like low-cost high-delight which does sound a bit better than "cheap thr
by fuzzfactor 1y ago
I would say "low-cost, high-impact" when that makes more sense.
In this case it's more like low-cost high-delight which does sound a bit better than "cheap thrills" ;)
The owls do seem to convey a sense of communal grumpiness, expressed individually :)
Not unlike HN at tines . . .