On first pass, it seems vague enough to border on click bait. Shallow compared to what? No knowledge? Adept knowledge? Expert knowledge? Is the argument we shou

On first pass, it seems vague enough to border on click bait. Shallow compared to what? No knowledge? Adept knowledge? Expert knowledge? Is the argument we should intentionally stop at "shallow"? Why isn't this clear? But, with the added context that it's from a personal blog, we should give the benefit of the doubt that the author is just not good at writing headlines and give the article a shot on its own merits...