3 ms·
I’ve built a few typecheckers (in different languages) that hew closer to Pyrefly’s behaviour than Ty’s behaviour. If you have a large codebase that you want t
by muglug 1y ago
I’ve built a few typecheckers (in different languages) that hew closer to Pyrefly’s behaviour than Ty’s behaviour.
If you have a large codebase that you want to be typesafe, Pyrefly’s approach means writing far fewer type annotations overall, even if the initial lift is much steeper.
Ty effectively has noImplicitAny set to false.