> I'd expect the lower bits to be changing at least half the time. I didn't read the code, but the readme focuses on whether less than 32.4% of bits are 1. So

> I'd expect the lower bits to be changing at least half the time. I didn't read the code, but the readme focuses on whether less than 32.4% of bits are 1. So even if a lot of the pixels are changing at the lower bits between each frame, so long as enough of the upper bits aren't changing, it should still in principle work?