4 ms·
>Not to mention most of it basically died when most models started supporting +1M context. Do most models support that much context? I don't think anything clo
by WaltPurvis 1y ago
>Not to mention most of it basically died when most models started supporting +1M context.
Do most models support that much context? I don't think anything close to "most" models support 1M+ context. I'm only aware of Gemini, but I'd love to learn about others.
- fkyoureadthedoc 1y agoGPT 4.1 / mini / nano
- consumer451 1y agoAs the context grows, all LLMs appear to turn into idiots, even just at 32k! > We evaluate 12 popular LLMs that claim to support contexts of at least 128K tokens. While they perform well in short contexts (<1K), performance degrades significantly as context length increases. At 32K, for instance, 10 models drop below 50% of their strong short-length baselines. Even GPT-4o, one of the top-performing exceptions, experiences a reduction from an almost-perfect baseline of 99.3% to 69.7%. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44107536 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44107536
- rs186 1y agoThis paper is slightly outdated by LLM model standards -- GPT 4.1 or Gemini 2.5 haven't been released at that time.
- consumer451 1y agoYes, I mentioned that in the comment in the linked post. I wish someone was running this methodology as an ongoing project, for new models. Ideally, isn't this a metric that should be included on all model cards? It seems like a crucial metric.
- humpty-d 1y ago[dead]