4 ms·
I think that's just in the nature of these tools. They are better at doing things you can't do (most of the things), but worse at the things you can do (very fe
by dgb23 1y ago
I think that's just in the nature of these tools. They are better at doing things you can't do (most of the things), but worse at the things you can do (very few things).
Ex: If you're a lazy typist like most, then a code assistant can speed you up significantly, when you use it as an autocomplete plus. But if you're a very practiced vim user and your fingers fly over the keyboard, or a wizard lisp hacker who uses structural editing, then a code assistant slows you down or distracts you even.