3 ms·

Agreed it's an issue - considered including it but didn't. It's fair to question how much developers should concern themselves with external costs for using th

Agreed it's an issue - considered including it but didn't. It's fair to question how much developers should concern themselves with external costs for using their service. Do we have a responsibility to design for data caps to prevent unnecessary charges? Do we have a responsibility to do the opposite, as an industry exerting pressure on carriers to increase cap levels? Somewhere in between? Honestly, I don't know. I'm inclined to design for a user's reality rather than a principle, but that "in the real world" thinking allowed the web to be dominated by "best viewed in IE6" sites.

gaelian 14y ago
> It's fair to question how much developers should concern themselves with external costs for using their service. I wouldn't go so far as to say we have a solemn duty to always take such issues into account. But as a designer/developer, it is certainly something I myself would spare a thought for because - putting on my consumer hat - I am directly affected by the problem of shitty data plans at present and I'd like to think it's something that designers/developers would be aware of, regardless of whether they then make an informed choice one way or the other. > Do we have a responsibility to do the opposite, as an industry exerting pressure on carriers to increase cap levels? I'd like to think this would work. But I really just can't see it. I too would be leaning towards designing for ther reality. But it seems we're in the time of 'case by case basis' on this issue. I don't think there's a single correct answer.