I agree it’s a hurdle for new artists, but don’t think it’s unfair per-se. If the Beatles, Eagles, Led Zeppelin, or others have content that continues to provi

I agree it’s a hurdle for new artists, but don’t think it’s unfair per-se. If the Beatles, Eagles, Led Zeppelin, or others have content that continues to provide enjoyment, why shouldn’t they continue to benefit financially for that fact? I don’t care how long it took to write and perform a song; I get benefit from being entertained not the work that went into it.