I'm finding quite often from reading these streams in my own chats there's a lack of strong logical consistency from one chunk to the next where it should clear

I'm finding quite often from reading these streams in my own chats there's a lack of strong logical consistency from one chunk to the next where it should clearly be there. That combined with the output not being consistent with the 'thoughts'. I'll screenshot it next time I see a good example 'thinking' here needs a clearer definition. Even for us humans the language is just an after the fact attempt at describing what went on, or is going on inside our heads Consider: https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2019/03/our-brains-reveal-our-choices-before-were-even-aware-of-them--st https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2019/03/our-brains-rev...