It's better than you miss out on a top performer than it is to hire someone into a senior position who turns out to be a bozo. Is it possible that thi

It's better than you miss out on a top performer than it is to hire someone into a senior position who turns out to be a bozo. Is it possible that this model stops working when you get to have tens of thousands of employees and you've scoured the planet looking for people that you end up empty-handed, so you have to increase your risk tolerance for bozos if it means you can hire a top performer? I guess google knows better than I about their hiring practices but it seems like they have probably taken more risks in these later years than they did when they had only 1000 employees.