3 ms·
Interesting that it is available for OS/2 and not Windows. If you are already supporting Linux and OS/2, it isn't much more work to support Windows too–and wil
by skissane 1y ago
Interesting that it is available for OS/2 and not Windows.
If you are already supporting Linux and OS/2, it isn't much more work to support Windows too–and will likely attract many more users than OS/2 support will
The FAQ [0] says:
> Iron Spring PL/I is free for non-commercial and hobbyiest use. The price of the commercial version has not yet been determined, but will be approximately two orders of magnitude less than IBM's compiler for Windows. Academic, Government, and Volume licenses will be available. A CD will be available at additional cost.
I'm sceptical the commercial version is ever going to happen now. This is a very small and shrinking market, 20 years ago selling it would have been a tough gig but you might have had some success, the same success today is going to be orders of magnitude harder. If you had a time machine to take this product back to the 1990s, it probably would have done much better, though even there it would have been a decisively niche product.
> The compiler is currently closed-source.
I wonder why people do this – I get why you want to keep your software closed source if you have realistic plans to commercially exploit it – but if you don't, why not just let people have the source code?
I've heard before stories about solo closed source developers who suddenly and unexpectedly die, and they'd left the source code on an encrypted disk, and even if their family gives some technical friend permission to try to retrieve it, turns out to be impossible because nobody knows the password. Open source, not an issue.
[0] http://www.iron-spring.com/faq.html http://www.iron-spring.com/faq.html
- Pet_Ant 1y ago> I've heard before stories about solo closed source developers who suddenly and unexpectedly die, and they'd left the source code on an encrypted disk, and even if their family gives some technical friend permission to try to retrieve it, turns out to be impossible because nobody knows the password. Open source, not an issue. I feel we need more code escrows for that reason. Keep it commercial till you die, fine, but let it live on afterwards.
- glhaynes 1y agoBest guess: that's because no organizations are writing their first PL/I apps in 2025; and there aren't many PL/I-using organizations who weren't big IBM customers, who largely migrated from OS/2 to Linux. So I wouldn't be shocked if a Windows version wouldn't bring in enough money to make even a relatively easy port worth it. Next-to-best guess: author was an OS/2-head, many of whom have been hating M$ Windoze for 30 years at this point! Ah, those were good days.
- skissane 1y ago> So I wouldn't be shocked if a Windows version wouldn't bring in enough money to make even a relatively easy port worth it. True, but I’m sceptical the Linux or OS/2 versions have ever brought in any money either. This looks to me suspiciously like a hobby project masquerading as a commercial venture