3 ms·
This is actually a good thing, now we don’t have to sift though a dozen semiautomatically created SEO gaming website that try and make the same point 5-6 said i
by NewsaHackO 1y ago
This is actually a good thing, now we don’t have to sift though a dozen semiautomatically created SEO gaming website that try and make the same point 5-6 said in slightly different ways.
- righthand 1y agoWhat is better? A single source or a variety of sources to determine bias? If I do publish on the web? What is my incentive to keep doing so if my site never gets seen in search results? What will fuel the LLM then?
- Rastonbury 1y agoI haven't used AI Mode but AI Overview often reads exactly like those 300 word bullet point listicles if you try searching for anything competitive like "best X for Y"
- danpalmer 1y agoI’m in two minds. On the one hand I want to consume quality original content. On the other hand when I ask a question, the top hit being the literal answer is such a convincing UX. But then again, I have always found the quality content through social media, links to blog posts, YouTube channels, etc. I’m not putting “quality politics blogs” into a search engine and never have done.
- nickfromseattle 1y agoSearch is one of the best ways for startups to compete against incumbents. AI will prioritize known / most popular brands. Want to start an alternative to QuickBooks? Using search you could get hundreds of thousands of people on your website. In the future? AI will recommend QuickBooks.
- move-on-by 1y ago> AI will prioritize known / most popular brands. This is the fiction that the AI creators want you to believe. The truth is that AI will recommend whatever its creators have trained it to recommend.