I have had a pretty similar experience to you. I have found some value here: - I find it is pretty good at making fairly self-contained react components or eve

I have had a pretty similar experience to you. I have found some value here: - I find it is pretty good at making fairly self-contained react components or even pages especially if you are using a popular UI library - It is pretty reliable at making well-defined pure functions and I find it easier to validate that these are correct - It can be good for boilerplate in popular frameworks I sometimes feel like I am losing my mind because people report these super powerful end to end experiences and I have yet to see anything close in my day to day usage despite really trying. I find it completely falls over on a complete feature. I tried using aider and people seem to love it but it was just a disaster for me. I wanted to implement a fairly simple templated email feature in a Next.js app. The kind of thing that would take me about a day. This is one of the most typical development scenarios I can imagine. I described the feature in it's entirety and aider completely failed, not even close. So I started describing sub-features one by one and it seemed to work better. But as I added more and more, existing parts began to break, I explained the issues to aider and it just got worse and worse with every prompt. I tried to fix it manually but the code was a mess.