3 ms·
I thought it was a different kind of nonsense, but it still has a subtle error. Goes to show even more how risky it is to repeat LLM answers as factual.
by namaria 1y ago
I thought it was a different kind of nonsense, but it still has a subtle error. Goes to show even more how risky it is to repeat LLM answers as factual.
- melvinroest 1y agoCould you point out what you mean? It's really hard to follow you. You say it's nonsense but it is not clear why. Then I write down a response that took me quite a while to format correctly (and to look up) and you then say "I thought it was a different kind of nonsense." Then you say it still has a subtle error. It is really hard to follow you if you don't explain yourself. I'm not saying it's factual. The reason I showed that answer was simply to verify to see if it was what you thought it was (hence I asked "is it?"). It turns out that it wasn't fully.