4 ms·
What is the deterministic alternative you suggest? I’m not endorsing this release practice in particular, it scares me. But I have been involved in a lot of au
by shermantanktop 1y ago
What is the deterministic alternative you suggest?
I’m not endorsing this release practice in particular, it scares me. But I have been involved in a lot of automation projects where perfection was the initial goal, and then abandoned because it was obvious that non-automated work was so imperfect. Human error is a fact of life.
- forkerenok 1y agoThe sibling comment from M4v3R covered this well.
- shermantanktop 1y agoDid it? I didn’t see a claim that doing this work manually had a zero error rate. Again, I would probably not do this. But let’s not pretend that non-AI release processes prevent all issues. We’re really talking different kinds of errors, and the ai driven ones tend to be obviously wrong. At least right now.
- danw1979 1y agoWhat I didn’t say was that “all devops release pipelines that use traditional scripted approaches are error free”.
- forty 1y agoIf you really have to use an IA, at least use it to generate code once and use that. This way it's deterministic and you get a chance to understand what happens and to debug issues. Not sure why IA could create something you couldn't however. And at least understanding what happens if part of the bundle.
- ygouzerh 1y agoI am a DevOps Engineer, all the thing that he described in the prompt can be just done by Github Actions except the summary of the PR. I don't condemn using LLM, but at least they could have use it in order to write better Github Actions instead.