4 ms·
Reason about: sure. Independently solve novel ones without extreme amounts of guidance: I have yet to see it. Granted, for most language and programming tasks,
by hyperadvanced 1y ago
Reason about: sure. Independently solve novel ones without extreme amounts of guidance: I have yet to see it.
Granted, for most language and programming tasks, you don’t need the latter, only the former.
- Workaccount2 1y ago99.9% of humans will never solve a novel problem. It's a bad benchmark to use here
- hyperadvanced 1y agoI agree. But it’s worth being somewhat skeptical of ASI scenarios if you can’t, for example, give a well formulated math problem to a LLM and it cannot solve it. Until we get a Reimann hypothesis calculator (or equivalent for hard/old unsolved maths) it’s kind of silly to be debating the extreme ends of AI cognition theory
- CamperBob2 1y ago"I'm taking this talking dog right back to the pound. It completely whiffed on both Riemann and Goldbach. And you should see the buffer overflows in the C++ code it wrote for me."
- hyperadvanced 1y agodog is a very different category man-made godlike super-intelligence
- guappa 1y agoBut they will solve a problem novel to them, since they haven't read all of the text that exists.