To clarify, I agree with the post above yours. There should be a corporate veil, but it should be pierce-able in extreme cases. Maybe it's already that way, but

To clarify, I agree with the post above yours. There should be a corporate veil, but it should be pierce-able in extreme cases. Maybe it's already that way, but doesn't seem to be employed all that often. My reason for the corporate veil is essentially a social theory, that society benefits from the higher level of investment that is made possible by letting people shelter their personal assets to a reasonable extent. It's essentially a government manipulation of the economy.