3 ms·
I'm suggesting the "default mode" would be that updating is explicit rather than automatic. The "10-15" year old comment can be taken in the context of languag
by fsloth 1y ago
I'm suggesting the "default mode" would be that updating is explicit rather than automatic.
The "10-15" year old comment can be taken in the context of language specifications for example. C++11 is a totally fine language standard, and since backward compatibility is the only reason for C++ to exist at this point there is no intrinsic benefit in using a later version.
- chrisweekly 1y ago> "I'm suggesting the "default mode" would be that updating is explicit rather than automatic" This, I agree with. Though for modern codebases, leveraging tools like Dependabot is very helpful. Deliberate upgrades, with automation to make it practical.