I might be just impressionable and naive, but if this is a false narrative, apart from me just finding it rather believable, it's also a surprisingly falsifiabl

I might be just impressionable and naive, but if this is a false narrative, apart from me just finding it rather believable, it's also a surprisingly falsifiable one: > According to Faris, she gave two people she’d met in a writing group access to the Google Doc where Rogue Souls lived to help with final revisions and to hunt for typos. She said one of them used AI to fix sentences without her knowledge. “I want to be clear: I never approved the use of AI and I condemn it because [of the usual talking points...] She could just publish the Google Docs document for people to review the edit history of. Not a Google Workspaces whiz, but my impression is that edit history is immutably retained, so unless one could reasonably speculate Google being in on the con, this would conclusively prove (support) her version of the story, particularly if the timelines work out. I wonder if she'd also have a legal case against the person who made the change.