You're leaving off both the "limited liability" and "it's a person with legal rights" parts of a corporation. If it's a person, then they might have to go afte

You're leaving off both the "limited liability" and "it's a person with legal rights" parts of a corporation. If it's a person, then they might have to go after the corporation. Alternatively, each corporate crime might be a conspiracy charge. With limited liability, it's unclear how much one can discourage the bad behavior if there's distance between the owners and the punishment. I oppose both of these concept by default for criminal behavior. Power and accountability should always go hand in hand. Only people should be people, too.