3 ms·

Looks like they compare it: https://trailbase.io/comparison/supabase/ https://trailbase.io/comparison/supabase/

• hahn-kev 1y ago
  Honestly they spent more time comparing supabase to pocketbase
  • trailbase-alt 1y ago
    The Supabase comparison is pretty poor and needs improvement. In many ways TrailBase and PocketBase are architecturally a lot similar. The key-difference of both compared to Supabase is that they're a single executable, easy to self-host, less resource hungry and in many cases faster (for better or worse due to their simpler architecture). In case you're interested: https://trailbase.io/reference/benchmarks/ https://trailbase.io/reference/benchmarks/