3 ms·
[Very good comment! I'd use the opportunity to add more questions.] How expensive are the steps? They look like advanced steps that can be done in a lab to pre
by gus_massa 1y ago
[Very good comment! I'd use the opportunity to add more questions.]
How expensive are the steps? They look like advanced steps that can be done in a lab to prepare a few micrograms, but I'm not sure if they can be scaled to industrial production.
Why silicon instead of just a carbon? Is it better blocking the docking? Is it better moving the orbital energy levels? Is it as safe as the poster claim?
- throwawaymaths 1y agosilicon is not very successful in drugs. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/silicon-drug-molecules-revisited https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/silicon-drug-molec... that molecule almost certainly fails the ClogP not greater than five lipinski rule (it's too greasy)
- gus_massa 1y ago[Sorry for the delay.] IIUC from the "In the pipeline" article, drugs with silicon are too similar to their equivalent with carbon, and more difficult to make: "so why bother?" Are they using the silicon to avoid the usual rules of substitutions in benzene cycles? Is it possible to do the same trick with carbon? > that molecule almost certainly fails the ClogP not greater than five lipinski rule (it's too greasy) Is it possible to fix it adding some -NH2 (or -COOH ?) group in the second aromatic cycle? [I understand it's a nice science fair project but the article oversell it.]