4 ms·

I'm not following what the "sticker collection" occupying the prime page real estate at top left is supposed to be. They have names like watercolor, realistic,

I'm not following what the "sticker collection" occupying the prime page real estate at top left is supposed to be. They have names like watercolor, realistic, cartoon, pixel art, neon, and graffiti, but all of them just look like photos. When I click on them there are two buttons with download/upload icons, but neither one is doing anything when I click it. The "Featured Pet Transformations" below that are good illustrations of the concept, except the "Happy Shiba" example starts from a not-shiba (long floppy ears) and through the magic of GPT-Image-1 becomes an entirely different dog (pointy triangular ears). That makes it look more like an image generator than a restyling of your actual pet. I wonder if there's anything you can do with the image transformation to make it keep distinctive features of the source material? "Tuxedo Cat" for another example, it makes up a different white and black cat from the one that was provided. The white patch in the original goes up around one eye while the sticker has a pointy triangle up the middle, and its legs were both white but in the sticker they're black with white paws. EDIT - giving it another look, the "Banana Buddy" example for Cute Style is also turning a bulldog into a terrier

deleted 1y ago
[deleted]
arthurcolle 1y ago
Thank you for the feedback. Those 'transformation examples' are definitely one thing that I was sloppy with. All of the nice outputs are actually derived from pet photos that are legitimately "visibly similar" to the outputs, but I really wanted to push this out so I didn't do my proper diligence. Here is a video walkthrough to show you some of the meat around image generation / sticker packing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xcn8dSt7CcQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xcn8dSt7CcQ I have been working on more advanced features like 1) splitting images into separate images, and 2) re-packing into a single image sheet after validation that the 'biometric color palate' and the 'specific physical attributes that make this thing the thing it is' passes are both sufficiently high in terms of confidence level. I wanted to initially just have a plain vanilla canvas that you plop images into and then have a "Loom" like experience for regenerating images / creating pseudo-pipelines with just touch/mouse commands and more, but I found that users said it was too opaque and required too much 'obscure prompt engineering experience' to click around to make outputs "pretty" (direct quote). thank you for taking a look @wlesieutre, I really appreciate it
- ljf 1y ago
  On the example images, the only one I'd be happy with is the pug (if these were my pets) - the rest actively disincline me from wanting to use the site, as my expectation is now that the site won't do a good job of turning my pet into a sticker. If I gave those stickers to my kids they would not recognise that they were the source animals.

deleted 1y ago

[deleted]

arthurcolle 1y ago

Thank you for the feedback. Those 'transformation examples' are definitely one thing that I was sloppy with. All of the nice outputs are actually derived from pet photos that are legitimately "visibly similar" to the outputs, but I really wanted to push this out so I didn't do my proper diligence. Here is a video walkthrough to show you some of the meat around image generation / sticker packing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xcn8dSt7CcQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xcn8dSt7CcQ I have been working on more advanced features like 1) splitting images into separate images, and 2) re-packing into a single image sheet after validation that the 'biometric color palate' and the 'specific physical attributes that make this thing the thing it is' passes are both sufficiently high in terms of confidence level. I wanted to initially just have a plain vanilla canvas that you plop images into and then have a "Loom" like experience for regenerating images / creating pseudo-pipelines with just touch/mouse commands and more, but I found that users said it was too opaque and required too much 'obscure prompt engineering experience' to click around to make outputs "pretty" (direct quote). thank you for taking a look @wlesieutre, I really appreciate it

ljf 1y ago
On the example images, the only one I'd be happy with is the pug (if these were my pets) - the rest actively disincline me from wanting to use the site, as my expectation is now that the site won't do a good job of turning my pet into a sticker. If I gave those stickers to my kids they would not recognise that they were the source animals.