4 ms·
> It's not really the best way to learn because it's the most expensive and time-consuming. The expense (time or otherwise) follows from how intimately you hav
by bigstrat2003 1y ago
> It's not really the best way to learn because it's the most expensive and time-consuming.
The expense (time or otherwise) follows from how intimately you have to get to know the subject. Which is precisely why it's the best way to learn. It's not always viable, but when you can spare the expense nothing else compares.
- eviks 1y agoNo, the expense follows from how many wasted options you'll have to go thorough. The working intimate knowledge can be acquired directly without that waste.