> Call me optimistic or whatever, but isn't that the best case scenario? Fair enough. I should have said "worst case, in the context of the system (as it is to

> Call me optimistic or whatever, but isn't that the best case scenario? Fair enough. I should have said "worst case, in the context of the system (as it is today) where a job is the primary way we have of gaining income to support ourselves (food, housing, clothing, etc)". So yeah, if the day comes when nobody has jobs AND we can work out a social/economic system that doesn't leave people destitute and starving in the streets, then it could be the "best case". I'm just not sure how we get there, at the moment.