2 ms·
Article is from 2012, compare [0] and [1]. The pdf got replaced for some reason (bug, sensitive information in the meta or idk), but the article seems to have
by bmacho 1y ago
Article is from 2012, compare [0] and [1].
The pdf got replaced for some reason (bug, sensitive information in the meta or idk), but the article seems to have stayed the same, except the date.
[0]: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.2590v1.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.2590v1.pdf
[1]: https://web.archive.org/web/0if_/https://arxiv.org/pdf/1201.2590v1.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/0if_/https://arxiv.org/pdf/1201....