TIL "noting the author and forum of a lecture with clear political relevance" == "innuendo". The point isn't that he's wrong (though multiple people here are i

TIL "noting the author and forum of a lecture with clear political relevance" == "innuendo". The point isn't that he's wrong (though multiple people here are indeed pointing out things that are). It's that (1) his not being wrong doesn't remotely justify current policy and (2) who he is and where he spoke was very clearly intended to justify current policy. I mean, duh, as it were. I mean, please. Link me another dry historical lecture hosted by Heritage. I dare you. Everything they do is political.