1. I'm a computer science graduate and work in IT, although the boring enterprise kind. ~5 years ago I would have easily signed a document vouching that we will

1. I'm a computer science graduate and work in IT, although the boring enterprise kind. ~5 years ago I would have easily signed a document vouching that we will not have the kind of interactive experience chatgpt gives us today, within my lifetime :-). So the notion that automatically generated content of any kind is "decades away" while the field is wildly unstable, seems like a tricky prophecy. I'll take that bet :-). 2. Social networks don't have any interest whatsoever in keeping creators humans. Creators are the cost, viewers or better yet paid subscribers, and the advertising buyers, are the revenue. IF majority of people are happy to consume generated content, social networks are happy to indulge. We on HN are assuming and hoping for some kind of human revolt, but we have historically been horrible at predicting such. Majority of people don't care a whif about stuff that HN cares about deeply (see: privacy, security,open source, etc:). (This is not a hypothetical as far as I'm concerned - Spotify already has popular LoFi / sleep / working music channels it promotes that are generated cheaply by AI, or session musicians that are one step away from being / being replaced by AI. YouTube and Facebook are full of clips which have chatgpt generating text, AI voiceover, and short AI clips merged together - today, vs decades from now).