4 ms·
Not surprising given the Times' background, that the CIA isn't mentioned at all as a suspect. Despite that quietly funding and boosting separatist groups is the
by perihelions 1y ago
Not surprising given the Times' background, that the CIA isn't mentioned at all as a suspect. Despite that quietly funding and boosting separatist groups is their quintessential modus operandi; that they've done this hundreds of times all over the world; and US intelligence is the most well-funded in the world; and US leadership has now without ambiguity signaled US' intention to end Canada as a sovereign nation.
They acknowledge the politician, sure; but they disregard the enormous state apparatus that politician wields, what it does and is capable of. The New York Times is pretty consistent about ignoring it.
Note US administration-aligned media has lately been spotlighting US annexation of Alberta[0], despite only 18% support in actual Alberta[1].
Note also the related intelligence admissions about Greenland[2].
[0] https://www.foxnews.com/video/6369677470112 https://www.foxnews.com/video/6369677470112 ("Canadian lawyer leading delegation to DC to make Alberta a state")
[1] https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-join-u-s-poll-1.7434317 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/canada-join-u-s-poll-1.743431... ("...the most support for that proposal in Alberta with 18 per cent of respondents agreeing Canada should join the U.S.")
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43910874 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43910874 ("U.S. Orders Intelligence Agencies to Step Up Spying on Greenland (wsj.com)")
- some_random 1y agoCredible news organizations require some amount of evidence before publishing.
- blast 1y ago"US leadership has without ambiguity signaled US' intention" That's a pretty funny way to describe the Trolling Bloviator.