3 ms·
Well I prefer to only mention things that are actually true, mate. Scandal, sensationalism, and junk science as a pretext to attack stuff that didn't happen lo
by AStonesThrow 1y ago
Well I prefer to only mention things that are actually true, mate.
Scandal, sensationalism, and junk science as a pretext to attack stuff that didn't happen long ago. What a surprise.
https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/no-evidence-of-mass-graves-or-genocide-in-residential-schools https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/no-evidence-of-ma...
https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/02/canada-gives-up-trying-to-prove-the-mass-graves-hoax/ https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/02/canada-gives-up-tryin...
The truth is that nobody else in Canada would take these children; they couldn't be educated in state schools; they were being displaced anyway, and many of them (being permanently poor) were sick and ready to die already. But for some reason Canadians are reacting like the children were placed in box cars and shuffled into gas chambers. Now they're running this B.S. "ground-penetrating-radar" campaign and it's literally seeing ghosts. GPR is detecting shadows. And they're interpreting the shadows without looking for facts or logic. And therefore these shadows are justifications to burn down more churches in the here and now. Good show.
- pavel_lishin 1y agoThe deaths didn't happen. And if they did, the current science can't prove it. And if it can, then the kids were already sick anyway. And if they weren't, it wasn't exactly like the holocaust. And if it was, another excuse will be found.