4 ms·
> […] all without appealing to an authoritarian source of control. Well that was partly what After Virtue was about: arguing it wasn't possible to have an obje
by throw0101c 1y ago
> […] all without appealing to an authoritarian source of control.
Well that was partly what After Virtue was about: arguing it wasn't possible to have an objective moral system without the supernatural.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After_Virtue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After_Virtue
And he's not the only one to hold this view (many atheists do as well):
* https://global.oup.com/academic/product/atheist-overreach-9780190880927 https://global.oup.com/academic/product/atheist-overreach-97...
You're left with either Nietzsche's arbitrary will, or virtues (à la Aristotle). For the latter, MacIntyre attempted to develop a system of morality (? ethics?) based on human biology:
* https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/655623.Dependent_Rational_Animals https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/655623.Dependent_Rationa...
Once can certainly tell oneself that there is a certain purpose or meaning to one's life, but if you're a materialist, then (the argument goes (AIUI)) it's not true.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is–ought_problem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is–ought_problem
The arrangement of atoms is arbitrary and without meaning, and to call some arrangement(s) "good" or "bad" or better / worse is a value judgement that is just as arbitrary and meaningless.
- keybored 1y agoLink dump at the ready. > And he's not the only one to hold this view (many atheists do as well): The author Christian Smith is apparently a Roman Catholic. What do you mean?
- throw0101b 1y ago> Link dump at the ready. Links to three books which I've read recently (some owned, some library), and a link to an overview of the topic which they cover. > The author Christian Smith is apparently a Roman Catholic. What do you mean? Whether he is or not, the book in question has numerous footnotes to people / philosophers who are atheists.
- keybored 1y ago> Whether he is or not, the book in question has numerous footnotes to people / philosophers who are atheists. “Many atheists do” (they are in the footnotes of this book written by a Catholic). That’s misleading.