2 ms·
It’s not that those language features are hard to understand. They’re all syntactic and don’t bring a ton of theory with them. It’s just that the tower of under
by sshine 1y ago
It’s not that those language features are hard to understand. They’re all syntactic and don’t bring a ton of theory with them. It’s just that the tower of understanding for basic programs is very tall, and the tendency to introduce abstraction essentially never ends. I spent ten years with Haskell as my go-to language and there are still things I don’t understand and haven’t explored. It’s not like that with Python, or Go, or even Rust.