4 ms·
> This applies to any depiction of a real person, regardless of context or rating - including PG and PG-13 content. Whether it’s a public figure, celebrity, inf
by throwanem 1y ago
> This applies to any depiction of a real person, regardless of context or rating - including PG and PG-13 content. Whether it’s a public figure, celebrity, influencer, or private individual, if a model or image is based on a real human being, it will be removed. This includes fan-art depictions of characters portrayed by a celebrity - e.g. Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford).
It is the second or third paragraph in the link.
- duxup 1y agoThe way they word it each time "real person" comes up I'm honestly unsure. I'll assume that means someone in real life. But ... won't that happen accidentally with AI depictions?
- throwanem 1y agoI assume they mean any natural person, and whether it happens accidentally (as opposed to "accidentally") does not appear at issue here. You can probably get Stable Diffusion to violate likeness rights if you try hard enough, but there is a material difference between that and publishing a tool making it trivial for anyone to do so. These are, or I suppose were, such tools: Loras specifically trained to replicate the appearance of specific natural persons. For public figures the rules are slightly different when it comes to one's likeness, but not absent. I can't imagine anyone sensible hosting that stuff for one second, Section 230 or no. But either way, however long this was going on, only a fool would assume it would last forever.