3 ms·
And all we have is DHS' word that Harvard didn't provide what was required. This is simply ridiculous and everything needs to be easier for the public to doubl
by eli_gottlieb 1y ago
And all we have is DHS' word that Harvard didn't provide what was required. This is simply ridiculous and everything needs to be easier for the public to double-check so we can call bullshit in the right direction.
- firesteelrain 1y agoYour bias is showing. Harvard could be wrong too. This is all being argued in the court of public opinion now
- malcolmgreaves 1y agoWhy would you ever believe the orange criminal and his gang members?
- firesteelrain 1y agoHe is not a criminal nor do we have gang members. Show some respect
- eli_gottlieb 1y agoHe is a criminal. He is a convicted felon.
- firesteelrain 1y agoAh yes, the justice system only works when it favors your guy. But sure, 12 random jurors in New York just happened to all get their talking points from MSNBC. Totally not how trials work. Let us know how the appeal goes - third time's the charm, right? I mean Biden was totally with it his entire term and didn’t have cancer either right?
- ImPostingOnHN 1y agoThe bayesean priors aren't the same for the two parties: One is a 30-time convicted criminal infamous for lying to get his way (tens of thousands of such lies on the record); The other is not. If your first instinct isn't that the infamous known liar isn't the one lying here, then the bias here is yours.