2 ms·
once you saw fit to do so I have no access to the code base. My supposition is based on some professional exposure to “broken window policy”, the nature of the
by brudgers 1y ago
once you saw fit to do so
I have no access to the code base. My supposition is based on some professional exposure to “broken window policy”, the nature of the comments in this thread, and what a rational actor might do if similar remarks were likely to under dead comments if that rational actor was motivated to create an environment fostering intellectually interesting comments.
To put it another way, I assume in the long run Hobbes is usually accurate. The sovereign’s sole responsibility is to keep the peace, and a Platonic philosopher king is the best outcome we are likely to get…which is to say that peace is kept by means most conducive to making each social contract a win-win.
But it is still a social contract. If a person doesn’t find its execution acceptable, a philosopher king allows them to leave with their health intact.
Again, I did not change the codebase.
- aspenmayer 1y agoI never said you did change the codebase. I think you misinterpreted me as referring to you personally, when I meant you exclusively, because it was eminently clear from context what each of us meant, but I'm happy to clarify that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clusivity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clusivity I agree with you about the pragmatic nature of moderation under discussion, to your point.