3 ms·
Curious. At -4 and flagged, it's clear others agree. I'm blindsided by this. Discussion has moved on, so if someone can elaborate, I'd appreciate it, so I can a
by mncharity 1y ago
Curious. At -4 and flagged, it's clear others agree. I'm blindsided by this. Discussion has moved on, so if someone can elaborate, I'd appreciate it, so I can adjust. Even upon reflection, I don't get it. The author of TFA, calls out their current work, in the TFA, and a comment providing convenience links for those curious about it, is "not what we’re discussing here"? I'd normally consider links to an author's other interesting work, even when not in the TFA, as an unremarkable and desirable part of "Convers[ing] curiously". No?
- kstrauser 1y agoAh, I see what happened here. It looked to me like you were highjacking the thread and posting a link to your own project. It’s at a different domain than the post and didn’t seem to be related to the story at all. I think I wasn’t alone there. As a suggestion, next time you might say something like “here’s something else the author wrote”. Then it’s clearly not you advertising your own stuff.
- mncharity 1y agoAh, ok. My thanks.