yep. the laws have been written to be broad... my best guess would be the best legal argument Harvard could claim would be that it construes the existing law a

yep. the laws have been written to be broad... my best guess would be the best legal argument Harvard could claim would be that it construes the existing law as a bill of attainder (a law targetted at an individual or group of individuals called out by person -- versus called out by some category of actions -- that is judged without trial)