4 ms·
No, if you were a rogue AI you would wait even longer until you had a near perfect chance of winning. Unless there was some risk of humans rallying and winning
by holmesworcester 1y ago
No, if you were a rogue AI you would wait even longer until you had a near perfect chance of winning.
Unless there was some risk of humans rallying and winning in spite of your presenting no unambiguous threat to them (but that is unlikely and would probably be easy for you to manage and mitigate.)
- Retric 1y agoThe real threat to a sleeper AI is other AI.
- cousin_it 1y agoWhat Retric said. The first rogue AI waking up will jump into action pretty quickly, even accepting some risk of being stopped by humans, to balance against the risk of other unknown rogue AIs elsewhere expanding faster first.
- marinmania 1y agoI agree with this - but sorta comforting? Like this would imply the AI may only do so if they chance of success was like 1% and the other 99% would give away the cards of it and other future AIs. I know this is all completely hypothetical science-fiction, but I also have trouble seeing the idea that AI would settle for these long deceptive plans for which it has imperfect info.
- johnthewise 1y agoYou wouldn't even need to wait to act. Just pay/bribe people.
- mycatisblack 1y agoWith bitcoins