4 ms·
How so humans need to know about all this? Isn’t it the exact use case where the machines write all the code as it is machine to machine protocol and some of th
by mrtksn 1y ago
How so humans need to know about all this? Isn’t it the exact use case where the machines write all the code as it is machine to machine protocol and some of the machine involved are supposed to be phd level programmers.
The MCP or something similar should exist but it should be handled %100 by AI so the people can do the stuff that is important and human related.
It rubs me the wrong way seeing people trying to understand this and if you take it on face value it appears that now AI can do the code but MCP is so hard that it needs a human who studied that so they can talk.
Is this piece of JSON really the last frontier of programming?
- Yoric 1y ago> The MCP or something similar should exist but it should be handled %100 by AI so the people can do the stuff that is important and human related. So far, the entire AI story feels very much like the opposite. The AI is (possibly) taking over the creative/fun stuff, leaving human beings to do the annoying parts.
- 0x457 1y agoI think MCP is pretty close to what LSP is. Many of MCPs shouldn't have existed, IMO. Here is an example: I wanted amazon q to interact with github, so I added to its context that it can use `gh-cli` and it it worked pretty well. Sure, it hallucinated things about json schema every new session, but it figured out how to "wait for checks to pass and merge if it's green." To make its and mine life easier, common things were saved as scripts in bin/ and Justfile (also generated by it). I needed it to fetch stuff, so i told it to use `curl`. Using github's official MCP bricks chat session every time for me.