3 ms·
> A lot of them would actually agree with the article, but historical sometimes wins Indeed – as evidenced by some parts of the world still using non-metric un
by lxgr 1y ago
> A lot of them would actually agree with the article, but historical sometimes wins
Indeed – as evidenced by some parts of the world still using non-metric units in daily life or even engineering :)
- perching_aix 1y agoAs a European if somebody tells me the diagonal size of a display in cm or meter, I'm simply not able to "grasp" it. I need to whip out the calculator and divide by 2.54, turning it into inches. It's just how monitors are measured in my head at this point.
- lxgr 1y agoWhen the Euro was introduced, I've heard people say things like "older generations will never adapt to the new currency, they'll always refer to the old denominations in their head" – which turned out to be completely untrue. Adapting to new units is very possible, but it needs a concerted effort. Absent a good inherent reason or anybody capable of artificially creating one, it won't happen on its own.
- djhn 1y agoDid it? I feel like 60+ year olds (current age) mostly still convert (bonus points for not accounting for inflation)
- perching_aix 1y agoWasn't arguing otherwise. If anything, I was illustrating so: I used inch so much, that despite it not being the native unit of length measurement over here, for the specific purpose I used it for it managed to stick incredibly hard.
- samuel 1y agoIt was a true concern, I know people who never got used to it. But were 70+ at the time and dead by now, so it eventually gets fixed, yeah.
- nfriedly 1y agoUsing the diagonal to measure the size of a display is also a bit weird because it doesn't compare well across aspect ratios. A 34 inch 21:9 ultrawide is actually smaller (in terms of area) than a 32 inch 16:9 display.