3 ms·
I will allow for sake of argument then trading for needs to be excepted. Under your definition it would also implode, just not fully destruct.
by ty6853 1y ago
I will allow for sake of argument then trading for needs to be excepted. Under your definition it would also implode, just not fully destruct.
- robertlagrant 1y agoTrading for wants is no different to trading for needs from a capitalism perspective. It just removes the need for a central bureaucracy that decides what counts as a need.