3 ms·

I think having a founder stay on and lead, well after they are financially independent is very respectable. It says they are interested in more than just chilli

• deleted 1y ago
  [deleted]
• asveikau 1y ago
  But when they cease to be competent and aren't able to admit it, it's less respectable.
• piva00 1y ago
  > It says they are interested in more than just chilling on the beach. Which is not necessarily a good thing, being more interested in reshaping the world even after it becomes clear their vision for the new world isn't making it better just leaves someone with lots of power and bad ideas, not a good combo. I'd much rather have them chilling on the beach after being done with the limits of their competence.
  • pacerier 1y ago
    Indeed, the Americans have a very weird ruler for respect, which measures solely by power and sex (anything else beyond this two you have to wax wordy essays to convince of its value and still have dubious success) due to its original sin, crossing oceans and expanding westwards for its own sake, fueled by raw sex and power, be it brutes, scientists, farmers, mormons, evangelicals, and missionaries, then they teach their children the same, who teach their children the same. Orphans and imports don't escape. Even those that are not born here (eg Musk), are eventually taught by society to do the same. Zuckerberg and friends don't just want to chill on the beach: They want to 0wn it. A common property, then redefine it as "obviously not common", at the expense of others, so that no one else can chill on the beach, unless you provide compensation, for obviously infringing upon their rightful rights duh.