3 ms·
You're mischaracterising "not wanting to overpay" and "getting something you need in return for what you have in excess" as "greed". It's a pointless conversat
by robertlagrant 1y ago
You're mischaracterising "not wanting to overpay" and "getting something you need in return for what you have in excess" as "greed".
It's a pointless conversation if you're willing to do that. You're just changing definitions before arguing them.
- ty6853 1y agoI will allow for sake of argument then trading for needs to be excepted. Under your definition it would also implode, just not fully destruct.
- robertlagrant 1y agoTrading for wants is no different to trading for needs from a capitalism perspective. It just removes the need for a central bureaucracy that decides what counts as a need.