4 ms·
> this is in the same tradition that prompted us to name the “wat” in honor of James Watt. The unit is Watt, not Wat.
by thrdbndndn 1y ago
> this is in the same tradition that prompted us to name the “wat” in honor of James Watt.
The unit is Watt, not Wat.
- ahofmann 1y agoI'm sorry, that you missed the hilarious joke! For reference: https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/talks/wat
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- thrdbndndn 1y agoAhh, I get the joke now. Good one :) As for the reason, if I have to guess, is because "decibel" looks better than "decibell". (Keep in mind decibel was actually renamed from the previous unit called "Transmission Unit" and was meant to be used as the main unit even at the beginning. "bel" was simply derived/implied from it, not the other way around).
- kazinator 1y agoWhoosh ...
- reichstein 1y agoYour irony detector may need calibration. Or mine does.