4 ms·
Sorry, but I refuse to believe you until you provide proof. What exactly did it remember? I think you are misreading the hallucinations here. If this was true,
by planb 1y ago
Sorry, but I refuse to believe you until you provide proof. What exactly did it remember? I think you are misreading the hallucinations here.
If this was true, there might even be laws here in Europe that they are breaking.
- 4ggr0 1y ago> there might even be laws here in Europe that they are breaking You're telling me an american technology corporation might have violated european laws? i can't imagine such a thing happening...
- planb 1y agoNo - but a random hacker news commenter wouldn't be the only one noticing this.
- landl0rd 1y agoI am not sure how I'd provide proof. But I'd encourage you to test it. It's always possible it's a bug. You can check with something like telling it that your real name is something very identifiable/not a typical name and working from there.
- planb 1y agoNo the name of the user is part of the system prompt. How would you think this works? You can get ChatGPT to tell you all it knows about you, which is more than memories but never anything out of old conversations
- landl0rd 1y agoNot the name of the user, a separate name. I'm aware of this. That is also not true, it can access old conversations, this is a known feature. I have been able to have it access back to the beginning of my using the site.
- mixmastamyk 1y agoWrong approach in this day and age. Data is big business. Snowden revs already over a decade old. Today: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44062586 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44062586 Oh, and soft deletion is a common pattern. Prove a tech company is not hoarding data—is the useful hypothesis for the last decade.