4 ms·
I've never understood why Red Hat never tried breaking into this space. People clearly don't mind paying for an OS and RHEL is pretty much as polished and well
by nan60 1y ago
I've never understood why Red Hat never tried breaking into this space. People clearly don't mind paying for an OS and RHEL is pretty much as polished and well supported as you can get. A fork of RHEL geared towards home use would be fantastic. I know Fedora exists but it isn't backed by RH the way RHEL is.
- nemomarx 1y agoGetting people to pay for an OS when the mainstream alternatives come bundled with hardware seems like a big lift. If they could work with system 76 or something maybe yeah
- 360MustangScope 1y agoJust like other companies, home users do not make much money compared to enterprises. No home user will pay $10,000 annually for example and think nothing of it. Enterprises is where the money is, that is also why a company like Cisco do not make consumer devices
- em-bee 1y agothey were. before RHEL, red hat linux was sold as desktop operating system to consumers. as was SUSE and a few others.
- nan60 1y agoAh, I didn't actually know this! I wasn't around for the early days of Linux so I don't know much about it.
- em-bee 1y agothe problem is really that selling operating systems just doesn't work. people buy devices with the OS preinstalled. the only way to change that is to make that practice illegal, and force people to choose and pay for an OS at the time of purchasing their device.
- akdev1l 1y agoThere is money to be made on consumer level OS. The reason people buy RHEL is because you can get support for any problems. Consumers are not gonna get that so they might as well just run CentOS Stream for example.